Xiaomi Redmi 12C vs Xiaomi Poco C71
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 12C Manufactured in January, 2023, with display 6.71 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85, vs Xiaomi Poco C71, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 12C
- Higher pixel density: 268ppi
- Lighter design: 192g vs 193g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C71
- Larger display: 6.88in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/32 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.71 in | 6.88 in |
| Resolution | 720x1650 pixels | 720x1640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20.6:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.6 % | 85.5 % |
| sRGB gamut | 96.1 % | n/a |
| Response time | 30 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1191:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 168.76 mm (6.64 in) | 171.79 mm (6.76 in) |
| Width | 76.41 mm (3.01 in) | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 8.77 mm (0.35 in) | 8.26 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green - Purple |
- Black - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 407 | 437 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1269 | 1438 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 708 |
| CPU | 82825 | 92232 |
| GPU | 42471 | 30830 |
| Memory | 70316 | 78630 |
| UX | 71403 | 78630 |
| NanoReview Score | 267015 | 270293 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 45.8 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 97 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 725 | n/a |
| Writing score | 9971 | n/a |
| Web score | 7250 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6271 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5540 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8529 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB |
3 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB - 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 13 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 13 | Android Go |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (24% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:05 h | 2:32 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8150x6150 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 0.1 MP |
Standard: 32 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/3/5/8 | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/5/8 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | December, 2022 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2023 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 150 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 70 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco C71 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0