Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
48
out 100
VS
70
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G Manufactured in June, 2024, with display 6.79 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G91 Ultra, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G, Manufactured in August, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 13 4G
- Lighter design: 205g vs 211g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 443ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5030mAh
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.79 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 pixels | 1220x2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 443 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (36-90 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88 % | 86.8 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 168.6 mm (6.64 in) | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 76.28 mm (3 in) | 78.1 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | IP69 |
| Back panel | Glass | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Pink - Yellow |
- White - Black - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 430 | 1029 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1369 | 2915 |
| CPU | 88268 | 224809 |
| GPU | 37622 | 179080 |
| Memory | 69807 | 132205 |
| UX | 81691 | 172330 |
| NanoReview Score | 277388 | 708424 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 18 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5030 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (42% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:17 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 06:21 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 13:07 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:19 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 125 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | 240 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.67 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.6 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | June, 2024 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2024 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 199 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
