Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z11x
56
out 100
VS
67
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G Manufactured in January, 2025, with display 6.88 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, vs Vivo iQOO Z11x, Manufactured in March, 2026with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G
- Larger display: 6.88in
- Lighter design: 212g vs 219g
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z11x
- Higher pixel density: 382ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7200mAh vs 5160mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.88 in | 6.76 in |
| Resolution | 720x1640 pixels | 1080x2344 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 382 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5 % | 85.9 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 171.88 mm (6.77 in) | 166.6 mm (6.56 in) |
| Width | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) | 78.4 mm (3.09 in) |
| Thickness | 8.22 mm (0.32 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP52 | IP69 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Purple |
- Black - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A78) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 613 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 192 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 955 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 244.5 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 910 | 1064 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2118 | 2878 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 3062 |
| CPU | 159982 | 329972 |
| GPU | 45714 | 147724 |
| Memory | 116434 | 155228 |
| UX | 99023 | 289303 |
| NanoReview Score | 421153 | 922227 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 5160 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 44 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (25% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 43 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:18 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.93 (0.34) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B41/B2840) | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | n/a | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 140 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes, 0 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z11x the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
