Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G Manufactured in January, 2025, with display 6.88 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C, Manufactured in September, 2020 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G35. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G
- Larger display: 6.88in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 9C
- Higher pixel density: 269ppi
- Lighter design: 196g vs 212g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 2/32 GB - 2/64 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.88 in | 6.53 in |
| Resolution | 720x1640 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5 % | 81.1 % |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 92.9 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 17120 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 47 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 881:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 171.88 mm (6.77 in) | 164.9 mm (6.49 in) |
| Width | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) | 77 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8.22 mm (0.32 in) | 9 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP52 | No |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Purple |
- Gray - Blue - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | MediaTek Helio G35 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A78) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Adreno 613 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| GPU Cores | 192 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 955 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | 244.5 GFLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 910 | 479 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2118 | 1522 |
| CPU | 159982 | 54580 |
| GPU | 45714 | 17708 |
| Memory | 116434 | 37174 |
| UX | 99023 | 32494 |
| NanoReview Score | 421153 | 141956 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
- 2 GB - 3 GB - 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | - 32 GB - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| OS Size | n/a | 18 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | MIUI 12 |
Battery
| Volume | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (25% in 30 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 2:18 h | 2:59 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6144 pixels | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 8 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 28 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 2560x1960 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 3/5/8 | GSM B2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B41/B2840) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20) |
| LTE category | n/a | 4 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | n/a | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | January, 2025 yr | June, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2025 yr | September, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 140 | 110 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi 14C 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0