Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G vs Infinix Note 60 Pro
60
out 100
VS
71
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G Manufactured in August, 2025, with display 6.9 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Infinix Note 60 Pro, Manufactured in February, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 15 4G
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 6500mAh
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 60 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 429ppi
- Lighter design: 201.7g vs 224g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.9 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1208x2644 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 374 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max brightness | n/a | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.1 % | 90.1 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 171.1 mm (6.74 in) | 162.37 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 82.1 mm (3.23 in) | 77.17 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) | 7.36 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 224 g (7.9 oz) | 201.7 g (7.11 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Metal |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Purple |
- Black - Silver - Gray - Orange - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 895 MHz |
| FLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 475 | 1239 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1514 | 3406 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 5104 |
| CPU | 114885 | 272642 |
| GPU | 57988 | 240454 |
| Memory | 103236 | 139244 |
| UX | 104881 | 170277 |
| NanoReview Score | 380990 | 828617 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | XOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 7000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | n/a | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 16 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 0:41 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2025 yr | February, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2025 yr | February, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 150 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 33 W | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix Note 60 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
