Xiaomi Redmi 7A vs Oppo Find X9 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 7A Manufactured in June, 2019, with display 5.45 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 439, vs Oppo Find X9 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 7A
- Lighter design: 165g vs 224g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 4.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/16 GB - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 5.45 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 720x1440 pixels | 1264x2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 18:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 295 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 530 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.4 % | 90 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 94.2 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 384 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 27 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 888:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 146.3 mm (5.76 in) | 161.26 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 70.4 mm (2.77 in) | 76.46 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm (0.37 in) | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 224 g (7.9 oz) |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Red |
- White - Gray - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.45 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2 (Cortex-A53) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 536 | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 505 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 450 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 43.2 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 477 | 3235 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1521 | 9626 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 29534 |
| CPU | 37665 | 1030180 |
| GPU | 14471 | 1453877 |
| Memory | 26778 | 709892 |
| UX | 39104 | 762936 |
| NanoReview Score | 118018 | 3956885 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 2 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 933 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 16 GB - 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 10) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 6.4 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | n/a | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:35 h | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | 06:26 h | 19:04 h |
| Video Playback | 09:44 h | 25:00 h |
| Games | 04:10 h | 10:24 h |
| Standby Mode | 90 h | 107 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 12 MP | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX486 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.5 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 21 mm |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/5 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 900, HSDPA 2100 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B800/B900/B1800/B1900/B2300/B2500/B2600) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Flagship |
| Announced | May, 2019 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2019 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 85 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0