Xiaomi Redmi 7A vs Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 7A Manufactured in June, 2019, with display 5.45 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 439, vs Xiaomi Poco M8 5G, Manufactured in January, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 7A
- Lighter design: 165g vs 178g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco M8 5G
- Larger display: 6.77in
- Higher pixel density: 388ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5520mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.1 vs 4.2
- Infrared port
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/16 GB - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 5.45 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 720x1440 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 18:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 295 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 530 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 74.4 % | 89.7 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 94.2 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 384 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 27 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 888:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 146.3 mm (5.76 in) | 164 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 70.4 mm (2.77 in) | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm (0.37 in) | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | IP65 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Red |
- Black - Silver - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.45 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2 (Cortex-A53) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 536 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 505 | Adreno 710 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 450 MHz | 1010 MHz |
| FLOPS | 43.2 GFLOPS | 517.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 477 | 1020 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1521 | 2853 |
| CPU | 37665 | 197012 |
| GPU | 14471 | 145492 |
| Memory | 26778 | 145821 |
| UX | 39104 | 150376 |
| NanoReview Score | 118018 | 638701 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 933 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 16 GB - 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 10) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 6.4 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 5520 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | n/a | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:35 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 06:26 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 09:44 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:10 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 90 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 12 MP | Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX486 | Omnivision OV50D40 Light Hunter 400 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9 | 1/2.88 (0.35) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.61 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/5 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 900, HSDPA 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B800/B900/B1800/B1900/B2300/B2500/B2600) | n/a |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2019 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2019 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 85 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 229 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco M8 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0