Xiaomi Redmi 8 vs Honor X6c
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 8 Manufactured in October, 2019, with display 6.22 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 439, vs Honor X6c, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 8
- Higher pixel density: 270ppi
- Lighter design: 188g vs 199g
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Honor X6c
- Larger display: 6.61in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5300mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.1 vs 4.2
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 6.22 in | 6.61 in |
| Resolution | 720x1520 pixels | 720x1604 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 266 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 1010 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.8 % | 84.6 % |
| sRGB gamut | 95.7 % | n/a |
| Response time | 55.2 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 2308:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 156.5 mm (6.16 in) | 165 mm (6.5 in) |
| Width | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm (0.37 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water resistance | Yes | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Red |
- White - Black - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.45 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2 (Cortex-A53) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 536 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 505 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 450 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 43.2 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 476 | 430 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1521 | 1394 |
| CPU | 55305 | 84372 |
| GPU | 15306 | 34982 |
| Memory | 50584 | 70145 |
| UX | 29875 | 65156 |
| NanoReview Score | 151070 | 254655 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 933 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 10) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 15 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12.5 | MagicOS 9 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes Quick Charge 3.0 (50% in 85 min) | Yes (30% in 20 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 3:20 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 08:09 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 10:10 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:49 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 110 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4000x3000 pixels | 8160x6120 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | n/a |
| 4K Recording | No | n/a |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 113 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 12 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX363 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3648x2190 pixels | 2592x1944 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4(1700/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B2100)) | |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | October, 2019 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2019 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 140 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 140 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor X6c the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0