Xiaomi Redmi 8 vs Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 8 Manufactured in October, 2019, with display 6.22 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 439, vs Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro, Manufactured in April, 2026 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 8
- Higher pixel density: 270ppi
- Lighter design: 188g vs 208g
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 4.2
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 4/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.22 in | 6.9 in |
| Resolution | 720x1520 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.8 % | 84.3 % |
| sRGB gamut | 95.7 % | n/a |
| Response time | 55.2 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 2308:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 156.5 mm (6.16 in) | 171.56 mm (6.75 in) |
| Width | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) | 79.47 mm (3.13 in) |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm (0.37 in) | 8.15 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Water resistance | Yes | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Red |
- Black - Gold - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.45 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2 (Cortex-A53) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 536 | No |
| Graphics | Adreno 505 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 48 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 450 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 43.2 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 476 | 436 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1521 | 1457 |
| CPU | 55305 | 144708 |
| GPU | 15306 | 20888 |
| Memory | 50584 | 128828 |
| UX | 29875 | 106958 |
| NanoReview Score | 151070 | 401382 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 933 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 10) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 15 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12.5 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes Quick Charge 3.0 (50% in 85 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 3:20 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 08:09 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 10:10 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:49 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 110 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4000x3000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | No |
| Wide-angle lens | 113 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 12 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX363 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/3.06 (0.33) |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3648x2190 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4(1700/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B2100)) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | October, 2019 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2019 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 140 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 120 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0