Xiaomi Redmi 9T vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 9T Manufactured in January, 2021, with display 6.53 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 662, vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE, Manufactured in September, 2025with chipsetSamsung Exynos 2400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 9T
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4900mAh
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 190g vs 198g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| Size | 6.53 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 1300 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4 % | 89.2 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 96.4 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 880 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 42 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1868:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.3 mm (6.39 in) | 161.3 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 77.3 mm (3.04 in) | 76.6 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm (0.38 in) | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Green - Orange |
- White - Black - Gray - Blue - Yellow |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2 (Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.9 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 11 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 683 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| FLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | 3406.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 511 | 2116 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1551 | 7035 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 18270 |
| CPU | 89386 | 429356 |
| GPU | 34918 | 715844 |
| Memory | 60894 | 352083 |
| UX | 61570 | 303719 |
| NanoReview Score | 247218 | 1801002 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 45.3 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 373 | n/a |
| Writing score | 6932 | n/a |
| Web score | 5529 | n/a |
| Video editing | 3683 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5170 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6197 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 12) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 21 GB | 23.8 GB |
| UI Skin | MIUI 14 | One UI 8.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 4900 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (25 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (25% in 30 min) | Yes (65% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:30 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 11:57 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 15:26 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:05 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 175 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | 8160x6120 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGM1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.57 |
| Pixel size | 8 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 75 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV8856 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/3.0 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/3.2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/3/5/8 | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 | UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66) |
| LTE category | 13 | 20 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2021 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2021 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 180 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 649 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy S25 FE the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0