Xiaomi Redmi 9T vs Tecno Pova 7 Pro 5G
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi 9T Manufactured in January, 2021, with display 6.53 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 662, vs Tecno Pova 7 Pro 5G, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 9T
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 7 Pro 5G
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 440ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 195g vs 198g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.53 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1224x2720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4 % | 88.9 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 96.4 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 880 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 42 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1868:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.3 mm (6.39 in) | 164.5 mm (6.48 in) |
| Width | 77.3 mm (3.04 in) | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm (0.38 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Green - Orange |
- Black - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2 (Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 11 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 683 | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1047 MHz |
| FLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | 536.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 511 | 1023 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1551 | 3091 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 2495 |
| CPU | 89386 | 228490 |
| GPU | 34918 | 152116 |
| Memory | 60894 | 159509 |
| UX | 61570 | 166360 |
| NanoReview Score | 247218 | 706475 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 45.3 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 373 | n/a |
| Writing score | 6932 | n/a |
| Web score | 5529 | n/a |
| Video editing | 3683 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5170 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6197 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 12) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 21 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 14 | HIOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (25% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 26 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:30 h | 1:00 h |
| Web Browsing | 11:57 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 15:26 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:05 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 175 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGM1 | Sony IMX682 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.7 |
| Pixel size | 8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV8856 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/3/5/8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | n/a |
| LTE category | 13 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2021 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2021 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 180 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 200 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Pova 7 Pro 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0