Xiaomi Redmi A2 vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi A2 Manufactured in March, 2023, with display 6.52 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G36, vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, Manufactured in July, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi A2
- Lighter design: 192g vs 208g
Reasons to choose Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 453ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Infrared port
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 2/64 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.52 in | 6.8 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1280x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.1 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 95 % | n/a |
| Response time | 30 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1303:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.9 mm (6.49 in) | 162.8 mm (6.41 in) |
| Width | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm (0.36 in) | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IPX9 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Active fan |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green |
- Black - Silver - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G36 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A53) |
- 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Hexagon |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 825 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS | 2355.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 477 | 2135 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1523 | 6613 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 18374 |
| CPU | 42168 | 488465 |
| GPU | 17833 | 879994 |
| Memory | 40327 | 358672 |
| UX | 30783 | 323198 |
| NanoReview Score | 131111 | 2050329 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 2 GB - 3 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | MIUI 14 | ColorOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (63% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:43 h | 0:56 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | 120 fps (1080p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | 4920x3264 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 22 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2023 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2023 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 115 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 359 |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo K13 Turbo Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0