Xiaomi Redmi A3 vs Oppo Reno 8T
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi A3 Manufactured in February, 2024, with display 6.71 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G36, vs Oppo Reno 8T, Manufactured in February, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi A3
- Larger display: 6.71in
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 8T
- Higher pixel density: 409ppi
- Lighter design: 183g vs 199g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/64 GB - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.71 in | 6.43 in |
| Resolution | 720x1650 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 420 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 180 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6 % | 84 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 95.1 % | n/a |
| Response time | 40 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1314:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 168.3 mm (6.63 in) | 160.8 mm (6.33 in) |
| Width | 76.3 mm (3 in) | 73.84 mm (2.91 in) |
| Thickness | 8.32 mm (0.33 in) | 7.85 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green |
- Black - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G36 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A53) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 230 | 728 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 840 | 1978 |
| CPU | 55340 | 134452 |
| GPU | 10749 | 52276 |
| Memory | 42864 | 102260 |
| UX | 45030 | 106577 |
| NanoReview Score | 153983 | 395565 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 8 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 1366 |
| Writing score | n/a | 11837 |
| Web score | n/a | 9254 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5357 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 7200 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 9054 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | 19 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI Go Edition | ColorOS 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:40 h | 1:15 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 100 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 100 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 100 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 22 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2, B3, B5, B8 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1, B5, B8 | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 4 | 13 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | February, 2024 yr | February, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2024 yr | February, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 80 | 350 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes 33 W |
Note
Xiaomi Redmi A3:
The smartphone in green color is 7 grams lighter than the others.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Reno 8T the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0