Xiaomi Redmi A3 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

40 out 100

VS

94 out 100

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi A3 Manufactured in February, 2024, with display 6.71 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G36, vs Vivo X300 Ultra, Manufactured in April, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages

Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi A3

Lighter design: 199g vs 232g

Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Ultra

Larger display: 6.82in
Higher pixel density: 510ppi
Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
Higher battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 5000mAh
Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
Supports DisplayPort
Supports Dolby Atmos
Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations

Memory Options

- 2/64 GB
- 3/64 GB
- 3/128 GB
- 4/64 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB

- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Vivo X300 Ultra

Display

Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness

Xiaomi Redmi A3

55

Vivo X300 Ultra

98

Camera

Main & front camera tests

Xiaomi Redmi A3

32

Vivo X300 Ultra

94

Performance

App & system performance

Xiaomi Redmi A3

15

Vivo X300 Ultra

99

Games

3D gaming performance

Xiaomi Redmi A3

11

Vivo X300 Ultra

96

Battery

Battery life, charging speed & type

Xiaomi Redmi A3

58

Vivo X300 Ultra

93

Connectivity

Connectivity features

Xiaomi Redmi A3

61

Vivo X300 Ultra

90

NanoReview Score

Overall score by NanoReview

Xiaomi Redmi A3

40

Vivo X300 Ultra

94

Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.

Customize your score

Function

Importance (Weight)

Display:

Camera:

Performance:

Gaming:

Battery:

Connectivity:

Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Display

Display quality comparison

Type	IPS LCD	AMOLED
Size	6.71 in	6.82 in
Resolution	720x1650 pixels	1440x3168 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	19.8:9
Pixel density	268 ppi	510 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate	No	Yes
Max brightness	420 nits	1800 nits
HDR support	No	Yes, Dolby Vision
Screen-to-body ratio	84.6 %	90.3 %
Features	n/a	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming

Peak brightness (auto)

Xiaomi Redmi A3

357 nits

Vivo X300 Ultra

n/a

sRGB gamut	95.1 %	n/a
Response time	40 ms	n/a
Contrast	1314:1	n/a

Sources: NotebookCheck [Xiaomi Redmi A3]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison

Height	168.3 mm (6.63 in)	162.98 mm (6.42 in)
Width	76.3 mm (3 in)	76.81 mm (3.02 in)
Thickness	8.32 mm (0.33 in)	8.49 mm (0.33 in)
Weight	199 g (7.02 oz)	232 g (8.18 oz)
Water resistance	No	IP69
Cooling system	n/a	Vapor chamber
Back panel	Plastic	Glass
Frame	Plastic	Metal
Colors	- Black - Blue - Green	- Black - Silver - Green
Fingerprint sensor	Yes In-Button	Yes, In-Display

Screen-to-body ratio

Xiaomi Redmi A3

84.6 %

Vivo X300 Ultra

90.3 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Redmi A3 and Vivo X300 Ultra In benchmarks

Chipset	MediaTek Helio G36	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max Frequency	2200 MHz	4600 MHz
CPU Cores	8 (4 + 4)	8 (2 + 6)
Architecture	- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A53)	- 6/3.63 (Oryon Gen 3 Performance) - 2/4.61 (Oryon Gen 3 Prime)
Process	TSMC	TSMC
Transistor Size	12 nm	3 nm
Neural Processor	No	Hexagon
Graphics	PowerVR GE8320	n/a
GPU Cores	32	n/a
GPU Frequency	680 MHz	n/a
FLOPS	43.5 GFLOPS	n/a

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Xiaomi Redmi A3

230

Vivo X300 Ultra

3621

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Xiaomi Redmi A3

840

Vivo X300 Ultra

10653

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)	230	3621
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)	840	10653

Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X300 Ultra]

AnTuTu 10

Xiaomi Redmi A3

153983

Vivo X300 Ultra

4247433

CPU	55340	1192014
GPU	10749	1543938
Memory	42864	525105
UX	45030	986376
NanoReview Score	153983	4247433

Memory

RAM Size	- 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB	12 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency	1600 MHz	5333 MHz
Channels	2	4

Storage Capacity	- 64 GB - 128 GB	256 GB
Storage Type	eMMC 5.1	UFS 4.1
Memory Card	MicroSD	No

Software

OS	Android 14	Android 16
OS Size	19 GB	n/a
UI Skin	MIUI Go Edition	OriginOS 6

Battery

Volume	5000 mAh	6600 mAh
Max Charging Power	10 W	100 W
Battery Type	Li-ion	Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable	No	No
Wireless Charging	No	Yes (40 W)
Reverse Charging	No	Yes
Fast Charging	No	Yes
Full Charge Time	2:40 h	n/a

Main camera

Matrix	8 MP	200 MP
Photo resolution	3264x2448 pixels	n/a
Zoom	Digital	Optical, 3.7x
Flash	LED	Dual LED
Stabilization	Digital	Optical
8K Recording	No	Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording	No	Yes (Up to 120 fps)
1080p Recording	Yes (Up to 30 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion	No	240 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens	n/a	116 °
Lenses count	Standard: 8 MP Depth: 0.08 MP	Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features	Bokeh effect	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support

Matrix	8 MP	200 MP
Aperture	f/2.0	f/1.9
Focal length	n/a	35 mm
Sensor	n/a	Sony LYT-901
Sensor size	n/a	1/1.12 (0.89)
Pixel size	n/a	0.7 μm
Autofocus	Phase autofocus	Laser autofocus
Stabilization	Digital	Optical

Matrix	n/a	200 MP
Aperture	n/a	f/2.7
Focal length	n/a	85 mm
Sensor	n/a	Samsung ISOCELL HPB
Sensor size	n/a	1/1.4 (0.71)
Pixel size	n/a	0.56 μm
Stabilization	n/a	Optical

Matrix	n/a	50 MP
Aperture	n/a	f/2.0
Focal length	n/a	14 mm
Sensor	n/a	Sony LYT-818
Sensor size	n/a	1/1.28 (0.78)
Pixel size	n/a	1.22 μm
Stabilization	n/a	Optical

Front camera

Matrix	5 MP	50 MP
Photo resolution	2592x1944 pixels	8192x6144 pixels
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.5
Focal length	n/a	24 mm
Sensor	CMOS	Samsung ISOCELL JN1
Sensor size	n/a	1/2.76 (0.36)
Pixel size	n/a	0.64 μm
Autofocus	No	Phase autofocus
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
Video resolution	1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps	2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor	No	No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version	Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)	Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5.4	5.4
Bluetooth features	LE	LE
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	3.2
USB features	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG
DisplayPort	No	Yes
GPS	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS
NFC*	No	Yes
Infrared Port	No	Yes

SIM Count*	2	2
SIM Type	Nano	Nano
SIM Mode	Dual SIM Standby	Dual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *	No	No
Hybrid Slot	No	No
2G Bands	GSM B2, B3, B5, B8	n/a
3G Bands	WCDMA B1, B5, B8	n/a
LTE Bands*	LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28)	n/a
LTE category	4	n/a
5G Support	No	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Mono	n/a
3.5 mm Jack	Yes	No
FM Radio	Yes	No
Dolby Atmos	No	Yes

Max Volume

Xiaomi Redmi A3

78.8 dB

Vivo X300 Ultra

n/a

Other

Class	Budget	Flagship
Announced	February, 2024 yr	March, 2026 yr
Release Date	February, 2024 yr	April, 2026 yr
Launch Price ($)	80	n/a
MSRP ($)	n/a	1199
Sensors	- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included	Yes 10 W	Yes, 80 W

Note

Xiaomi Redmi A3:

The smartphone in green color is 7 grams lighter than the others.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?

Xiaomi Redmi A3

0 (0%)

Vivo X300 Ultra

1 (100%)

Total Votes: 1

Xiaomi Redmi A3 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Key Differences

Versions

Review

Tests & specs

Display

Design & Build

Performance

Memory

Software

Battery

Main camera

Front camera

Connectivity

Sound

Other

Note

Results

Survey

User comments