Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G vs Vivo iQOO Z10
52
out 100
VS
69
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G Manufactured in March, 2025, with display 6.88 with chipsetUnisoc T7250, vs Vivo iQOO Z10, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G
- Larger display: 6.88in
- Lighter design: 193g vs 199g
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z10
- Higher pixel density: 388ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7300mAh vs 5200mAh
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.88 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 720x1640 pixels | 1080x2392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.8 % | 88.7 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 171.17 mm (6.74 in) | 163.4 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) | 76.4 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 8.26 mm (0.33 in) | 7.93 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | Yes |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Blue - Green |
- Black - Silver |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.5 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| FLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS | 537.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 441 | 1159 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1496 | 3291 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 708 | n/a |
| CPU | 91026 | 273371 |
| GPU | 30797 | 205536 |
| Memory | 75780 | 142285 |
| UX | 66310 | 183744 |
| NanoReview Score | 263913 | 804936 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | n/a |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | Android Go | FuntouchOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5200 mAh | 7300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (23% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:30 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 34:00 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 29:00 h |
| Games | n/a | 9:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | n/a |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 32 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM 850/900/1800Mhz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/5/82G | LTE B1/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2025 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 129 | 255 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z10 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
