Xiaomi Redmi K70E vs Xiaomi Poco F7
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi K70E Manufactured in December, 2023, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, vs Xiaomi Poco F7, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi K70E
- Lighter design: 198g vs 215.7g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco F7
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 447ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.4
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 pixels | 1280x2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | n/a | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 1700 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 480 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90 % | 90.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.45 mm (6.32 in) | 163.1 mm (6.42 in) |
| Width | 74.34 mm (2.93 in) | 77.9 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 8.05 mm (0.32 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 215.7 g (7.61 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | n/a | Glass |
| Frame | n/a | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green |
- White - Black - Silver |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Adreno 825 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 2355.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1505 | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4821 | n/a |
| CPU | 279138 | n/a |
| GPU | 543585 | n/a |
| Memory | 345440 | n/a |
| UX | 245197 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 1413360 | n/a |
| Stability | 89 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 58 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 9818 | n/a |
| Writing score | 17472 | n/a |
| Web score | 13169 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6389 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 11576 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 13081 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 14 min) | Yes (90% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:34 h | 0:39 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 10:04 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:33 h |
| Games | n/a | 07:02 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 130 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 1920 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | Omnivision OV08F |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4608x3456 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV16A1Q | Omnivision OV20B |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B3/B5/B8 | GSM B3/B5/B8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 | WCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B66) | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B19/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | December, 2023 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2023 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 380 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 399 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | Yes 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Poco F7 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0