Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G vs Oppo Find X9 Pro
54
out 100
VS
96
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Manufactured in February, 2022, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs Oppo Find X9 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Lighter design: 202g vs 224g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1264x2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 700 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9 % | 90 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 90.2 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 521 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.2 mm (6.46 in) | 161.26 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 in) | 76.46 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 8.12 mm (0.32 in) | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 224 g (7.9 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Gray - Blue |
- White - Gray - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 619 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 916 | 3235 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2265 | 9626 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 29534 |
| CPU | 132327 | 1030180 |
| GPU | 102701 | 1453877 |
| Memory | 78299 | 709892 |
| UX | 90934 | 762936 |
| NanoReview Score | 404261 | 3956885 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 37.6 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 7 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1199 | n/a |
| Writing score | 11162 | n/a |
| Web score | 7567 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4159 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 7958 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8598 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 31 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (74% in 30 min) | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:45 h | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:57 h | 19:04 h |
| Video Playback | 12:43 h | 25:00 h |
| Games | 05:33 h | 10:24 h |
| Standby Mode | 119 h | 107 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12032x9024 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 118 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHM2 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.5 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.14 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4608x3456 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV16A1Q | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8/19 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) |
| LTE category | 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | n/a | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 329 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
