Home Phone comparison Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus - Which is better?

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus

54 out 100
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
VS
87 out 100
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Manufactured in February, 2022, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus, Manufactured in August, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
  • Lighter design: 202g vs 212g
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
  • Larger display: 6.78in
  • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 4/128 GB
- 6/64 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
vs
iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 in 6.78 in
Resolution 1080x2400 pixels 1260x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 395 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes
Max brightness 700 nits 2000 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10 Yes, HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate 360 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 85.9 % 89.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
745 nits
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
n/a
sRGB gamut90.2 %n/a
PWM (Flicker)521 Hzn/a
Response time1 msn/a
Contrast∞ Infiniten/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 164.2 mm (6.46 in) 163.7 mm (6.44 in)
Width 76.1 mm (3 in) 75.9 mm (2.99 in)
Thickness 8.12 mm (0.32 in) 8.2 mm (0.32 in)
Weight 202 g (7.13 oz) 212 g (7.48 oz)
Water resistance IP53 IP65
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel Glass n/a
Frame Plastic Plastic
Colors - White
- Gray
- Blue		 - White
- Gold
- Gray
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
85.9 %
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
89.3 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 3730 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55))
- 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78))		 - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon 686 MediaTek NPU 890
Graphics Adreno 619 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU Cores 256 1536
GPU Frequency 950 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS 430.1 GFLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
916
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
2816
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
2265
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
8686
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)9162816
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)22658686
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a21322
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G], [Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
404261
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
2701004
CPU132327632892
GPU1027011177786
Memory78299405582
UX90934484744
NanoReview Score4042612701004
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
1199
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
n/a
Max Surface Temp.37.6 °Cn/a
Stability99 %n/a
Graphics Test7 fpsn/a
Graphics Score1199n/a
Sources: 3DMark [Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
8598
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
n/a
Writing score11162n/a
Web score7567n/a
Video editing4159n/a
Data manipulation7958n/a
NanoReview Score8598n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 6 GB
- 8 GB		 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 64 GB
- 128 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) Android 15
OS Size 31 GB n/a
UI Skin HyperOS 1.0 OriginOS 5

Battery

Volume 5000 mAh 8000 mAh
Max Charging Power 67 W 90 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes (74% in 30 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 0:45 h n/a
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
22:17
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
n/a
Web Browsing07:57 hn/a
Video Playback12:43 hn/a
Games05:33 hn/a
Standby Mode119 hn/a

Main camera

Matrix 108 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 12032x9024 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 120 fps (720p) n/a
Wide-angle lens 118 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 108 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Macro: 2 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix108 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.9f/1.8
Focal length26 mmn/a
SensorSamsung S5KHM2Sony LYT-600
Sensor size1/1.521/2
Pixel size0.7 μm0.8 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocus (Dual Pixel)Phase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix8 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.2
SensorSony IMX355n/a
Sensor size1/2.8n/a
Pixel size1.14 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 16 MP 16 MP
Photo resolution 4608x3456 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.5
Sensor Omnivision OV16A1Q n/a
Sensor size 1/3.06 1/3.0
Pixel size 1 μm n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.1 5.4
Bluetooth features LE, A2DP LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Varies by region Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotYesNo
2G BandsGSM 850 900 1800 1900MHzn/a
3G BandsWCDMA 1/2/4/5/8/19n/a
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B66)n/a
LTE category18n/a
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo n/a
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio n/a No
Dolby Atmos Yes n/a
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
87.6 dB
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
n/a

Other

Class Mid-range Flagship
Announced January, 2022 yr August, 2025 yr
Release Date February, 2022 yr August, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 329 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 320
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 67 W Yes, 90 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below