Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 vs Tecno Spark 8C
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Manufactured in March, 2023, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Tecno Spark 8C, Manufactured in February, 2022with chipsetUnisoc T606. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 12
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 183.5g vs 193g
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 8C
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 2/64 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.6 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 720x1612 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 267 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1200 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3 % | 84.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 100 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 484 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 5 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.66 mm (6.52 in) | 164.57 mm (6.48 in) |
| Width | 75.96 mm (2.99 in) | 76 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 7.85 mm (0.31 in) | 8.95 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 183.5 g (6.47 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | IPX2 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Green |
- Black - Gray - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Unisoc T606 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | No |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 650 MHz |
| FLOPS | 319.2 GFLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 375 | 499 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1494 | 1540 |
| CPU | 117343 | 78764 |
| GPU | 42979 | 22204 |
| Memory | 113571 | 59509 |
| UX | 72798 | 64021 |
| NanoReview Score | 346691 | 224498 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 40.9 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | 98 % |
| Graphics Test | 3 fps | 2 fps |
| Graphics Score | 641 | 396 |
| Writing score | 10190 | 7592 |
| Web score | 8571 | 6908 |
| Video editing | 4771 | 4874 |
| Data manipulation | 7223 | 6030 |
| NanoReview Score | 8890 | 7467 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
- 2 GB - 3 GB - 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 11 |
| OS Size | 21 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | HiOS 7.6 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (55% in 30 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:11 h | 2:50 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:20 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 15:10 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:33 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 113 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | No |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - Beidou |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | n/a |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz | GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | UMTS 2100 / 900 MHz |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B3)/B40)/B1800(/B2300() |
| LTE category | 13 | 4 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | March, 2023 yr | January, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2023 yr | February, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 229 | 110 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0