Home Phone comparison Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro and Honor 400 - Which is better?

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro vs Honor 400

63 out 100
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
VS
73 out 100
Honor 400
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
Honor 400

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro Manufactured in June, 2023, with display 6.6 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra, vs Honor 400, Manufactured in May, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
  • Larger display: 6.6in
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
Reasons to choose Honor 400
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Lighter design: 184g vs 200g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5300mAh vs 5080mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
  • Built-in eSIM

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB		 - 8/256 GB
- 8/512 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro and Honor 400
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Redmi Note 12T Pro
vs
Honor 400

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD AMOLED
Size 6.6 in 6.55 in
Resolution 1080x2460 pixels 1264x2736 pixels
Aspect ratio 21:9 19.5:9
Pixel density 407 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes
Max brightness 650 nits n/a
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate 270 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 83.7 % 90.2 %
Features DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 163.6 mm (6.44 in) 156.5 mm (6.16 in)
Width 74.3 mm (2.93 in) 74.6 mm (2.94 in)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 in) 7.3 mm (0.29 in)
Weight 200 g (7.05 oz) 184 g (6.49 oz)
Water resistance IP53 IP66
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel Plastic n/a
Frame Plastic n/a
Colors - White
- Black
- Blue		 - Black
- Silver
- Gold
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
83.7 %
Honor 400
90.2 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro and Honor 400 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Max Frequency 3100 MHz 2630 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex A55)
- 3/3 (Cortex A78)
- 1/3.1 (Cortex A78)		 - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510))
- 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715))
- 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715))
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU 580 Yes
Graphics Mali-G610 MP6 Adreno 720
GPU Cores 768 512
GPU Frequency 950 MHz 975 MHz
FLOPS 1442 GFLOPS 998.4 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
1237
Honor 400
1142
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
3874
Honor 400
3180
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)12371142
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)38743180
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a4046
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro], [Honor 400]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
882778
Honor 400
854878
CPU263673267068
GPU230693234936
Memory186334193158
UX202078159716
NanoReview Score882778854878
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
5886
Honor 400
n/a
Stability95 %n/a
Graphics Test35 fpsn/a
Graphics Score5886n/a
Sources: 3DMark [Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
13679
Honor 400
n/a
Writing score17698n/a
Web score11740n/a
Video editing7210n/a
Data manipulation11651n/a
NanoReview Score13679n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 8 GB
- 12 GB		 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 128 GB
- 256 GB
- 512 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 13 Android 15
UI Skin MIUI 14 MagicOS 9

Battery

Volume 5080 mAh 5300 mAh
Max Charging Power 67 W 66 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 20 min) Yes (44% in 15 min)
Full Charge Time 0:57 h 0:57 h

Main camera

Matrix 64 MP 200 MP
Photo resolution 9248x6936 pixels n/a
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (720p) n/a
Wide-angle lens 120 ° 112 °
Lenses count Standard: 64 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Macro: 2 MP		 Standard: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 12 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix64 MP200 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Focal length23 mmn/a
SensorOmnivision OV64BSamsung ISOCELL HP3
Sensor size1/21/1.4
Pixel size0.7 μm0.56 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix8 MP12 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.2
SensorSamsung S5K4H7n/a
Sensor size1/4n/a
Pixel size1.12 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 16 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 4608x3456 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.1
Sensor Omnivision OV16A10 n/a
Sensor size 1/3.06 n/a
Pixel size 1 μm 0.64 μm
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo n/a
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio No No

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced May, 2023 yr May, 2025 yr
Release Date June, 2023 yr May, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 350 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 499
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 67 W Yes 66 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below