Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G vs Vivo X100 Pro
60
out 100
VS
86
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99 Ultra, vs Vivo X100 Pro, Manufactured in November, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- Lighter design: 188g vs 225g
Reasons to choose Vivo X100 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.9 % | 89.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 105.7 % | 99.8 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 119 Hz | 369 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.1 mm (6.34 in) | 164.05 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 74.95 mm (2.95 in) | 75.28 mm (2.96 in) |
| Thickness | 7.98 mm (0.31 in) | 8.91 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 225 g (7.94 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green - Purple |
- White - Black - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek APU 790 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 727 | 2231 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1998 | 7526 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1291 | n/a |
| CPU | 139254 | 490601 |
| GPU | 65861 | 893392 |
| Memory | 114290 | 446780 |
| UX | 108505 | 321411 |
| NanoReview Score | 427910 | 2152184 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 51.1 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 66 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 92 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 15478 |
| Writing score | n/a | 23039 |
| Web score | n/a | 11895 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5599 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 12384 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 14116 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| OS Size | 17 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | Funtouch 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (73% in 30 min) | Yes (60% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:49 h | 0:31 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:57 h | 09:38 h |
| Video Playback | 11:26 h | 14:53 h |
| Games | 05:19 h | 06:25 h |
| Standby Mode | 134 h | 94 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 16384x12288 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 4.3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Sony IMX989 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/0.98 |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | 1.6 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | n/a | 100 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.14 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 70 |
| Preview | n/a | 81 |
| Zoom | n/a | 155 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4608x3456 pixels | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV16A1Q | Samsung S5KGD2 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | n/a |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MH |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) |
| LTE category | 12 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2024 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2024 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 349 | 800 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes 100 W |
Note
Vivo X100 Pro:
The top version (with 16 GB) comes with LPDDR5T memory, while the others feature LPDDR5X.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
