Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G vs Xiaomi Mi 9
66
out 100
VS
50
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, vs Xiaomi Mi 9, Manufactured in April, 2019 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 855. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher pixel density: 446ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3300mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 9
- Lighter design: 173g vs 204.5g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/64 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.39 in |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7 % | 85.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 96.4 % | 95.4 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | 245 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 4.2 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.4 mm (6.35 in) | 157.5 mm (6.2 in) |
| Width | 74.2 mm (2.92 in) | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 7.6 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 204.5 g (7.21 oz) | 173 g (6.1 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green - Purple |
- Black - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)) - 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) - 1/2.84 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 650 | Hexagon 690 |
| Graphics | Mali-G610 MP4 | Adreno 640 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 1130 MHz | 585 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1145 GFLOPS | 898.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1119 | 898 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2690 | 2206 |
| CPU | 242812 | 209300 |
| GPU | 180896 | 191747 |
| Memory | 155997 | 113809 |
| UX | 170927 | 136185 |
| NanoReview Score | 750632 | 651041 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 35.6 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 91 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 18 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3100 |
| Writing score | n/a | 14618 |
| Web score | n/a | 7084 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6715 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 7931 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 10649 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB - 16 GB |
6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| OS Size | 39 GB | 13.5 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | MIUI 12.5 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 3300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 27 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (20 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (67% in 15 min) | Yes Quick Charge 4 (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:25 h | 1:30 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:52 h | 06:08 h |
| Video Playback | 11:32 h | 11:37 h |
| Games | 05:27 h | 04:07 h |
| Standby Mode | 89 h | 83 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 16384x12288 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital (lossless), 4x | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 117 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 16 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 12 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 54 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3M5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.6 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | Sony IMX481 |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | 1/3.0 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 60 | n/a |
| Preview | 64 | n/a |
| Zoom | 109 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4608x3456 pixels | 5184x3880 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 18 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV16A1Q | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | 1/3 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.9 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B66) | LTE (B800/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | September, 2023 yr | February, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2024 yr | April, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 449 | 460 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 120 W | n/a |
Note
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G:
The eco-leather version is 5.5 grams lighter than the regular one.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
