Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G vs OnePlus 12
72
out 100
VS
86
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G Manufactured in January, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, vs OnePlus 12, Manufactured in February, 2024 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G
- Lighter design: 205g vs 220g
Reasons to choose OnePlus 12
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher pixel density: 510ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 5110mAh
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB - 24/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.82 in |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 pixels | 1440x3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.8:9 |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | n/a | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 480 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.5 % | 91.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.1 % | 99.5 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | 11 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.53 mm (6.4 in) | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 74.67 mm (2.94 in) | 75.8 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) | 9.15 mm (0.36 in) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP65 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Green - Purple |
- White - Black - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 3300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.5 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
- 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 810 | Adreno 750 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1050 MHz | 903-1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 537.6 GFLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1161 | 2314 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3104 | 7063 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 3327 | n/a |
| CPU | 272657 | 375207 |
| GPU | 191996 | 822387 |
| Memory | 138806 | 389261 |
| UX | 146907 | 340951 |
| NanoReview Score | 750366 | 1927806 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 50.5 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 70 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 103 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 17208 |
| Writing score | n/a | 17540 |
| Web score | n/a | 12385 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6200 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 13585 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 13384 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 12 GB - 16 GB - 24 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| OS Size | 32 GB | 30 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 1.0 | OxygenOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5110 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (70% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 0:24 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:26 h | 13:10 h |
| Video Playback | 13:31 h | 18:49 h |
| Games | 05:43 h | 06:05 h |
| Standby Mode | 102 h | 114 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 16320x12240 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 114 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 48 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHP3 | Sony LYT-T808 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/1.43 |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 64 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | Sony IMX581 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 6560x4928 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV20B | Sony IMX615 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/2.74 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B28B/B30/B32/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | n/a | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | December, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2025 yr | February, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 449 | 799 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 120 W | Yes 100 W |
Note
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus 5G:
The black and blue models (glass back) are 8.75 thick and weigh 210.14g, while the purple model (eco-leather) is 8.85 and 205.13g.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider OnePlus 12 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
