Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G vs Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
67
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G Manufactured in December, 2025, with display 6.77 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200 Ultra, vs Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro, Manufactured in April, 2026 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
- Higher pixel density: 388ppi
- Lighter design: 195g vs 208g
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 6000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C81 Pro
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 4/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.77 in | 6.9 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | n/a | 800 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1 % | 84.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.2 mm (6.43 in) | 171.56 mm (6.75 in) |
| Width | 76.3 mm (3 in) | 79.47 mm (3.13 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.15 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP65 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Gold - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultra | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 64 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 734 | 436 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2008 | 1457 |
| CPU | 139717 | 144708 |
| GPU | 65836 | 20888 |
| Memory | 124991 | 128828 |
| UX | 117387 | 106958 |
| NanoReview Score | 447931 | 401382 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 6500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4 (0.25) | 1/3.06 (0.33) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4 (0.25) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3 (0.33) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | December, 2025 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2025 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 120 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
