Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A08 4G
70
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Manufactured in August, 2025, with display 6.83 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra, vs Samsung Galaxy A08 4G, Manufactured in September, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 443ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 6000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A08 4G
- Lighter design: 197g vs 211g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 4/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | PLS TFT |
| Size | 6.83 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1220x2772 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 443 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-90 Hz) |
| Max brightness | n/a | 450 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8 % | 83.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) | 167.4 mm (6.59 in) |
| Width | 78.1 mm (3.07 in) | 77.4 mm (3.05 in) |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 211 g (7.44 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP64 |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Purple |
- Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 655 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 256 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1029 | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2915 | 2070 |
| CPU | 224809 | 211930 |
| GPU | 179080 | 41397 |
| Memory | 132205 | 106181 |
| UX | 172330 | 143519 |
| NanoReview Score | 708424 | 503026 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 17 |
| OS Size | n/a | 18.7 GB |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | One UI 9.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 25 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (38% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:50 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8160x6120 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | n/a | GalaxyCore GC08A8 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | UMTS B1(2100), B5(850), B8(900) |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | August, 2025 yr | September, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2025 yr | September, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 240 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 45 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
