Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
43
out 100
VS
90
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Manufactured in October, 2019, with display 6.53 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G90T, vs Vivo X300 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
- Lighter design: 200g vs 226g
Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6510mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.53 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 640 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.4 mm (6.35 in) | 161.98 mm (6.38 in) |
| Width | 76.4 mm (3.01 in) | 75.48 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP52 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Gray - Blue - Green |
- White - Black - Blue - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G90T | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2050 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.05 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 2.0 | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G76 MP4 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 144 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 230.4 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 602 | 3447 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1684 | 10378 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 25723 |
| CPU | 120779 | 1043247 |
| GPU | 78652 | 1510982 |
| Memory | 72733 | 667254 |
| UX | 96826 | 790449 |
| NanoReview Score | 368990 | 4011932 |
| Stability | 87 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 7 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1321 | n/a |
| Writing score | 8202 | n/a |
| Web score | 6022 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5662 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 7000 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8104 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 10.3 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12.5 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 4500 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (30% in 30 min) | Yes (55% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | 0:29 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:29 h | 08:45 h |
| Video Playback | 12:01 h | 14:55 h |
| Games | 05:02 h | 06:08 h |
| Standby Mode | 115 h | 81 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9000x7000 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGW1 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | n/a | 85 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.56 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5184x3880 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3T1 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.9 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 12 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | August, 2019 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2019 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 220 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 899 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
