Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T vs Tecno Pova 7 Neo
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Manufactured in December, 2019, with display 6.3 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 665, vs Tecno Pova 7 Neo, Manufactured in July, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
- Higher pixel density: 409ppi
- Lighter design: 200g vs 203g
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/32 GB - 4/32 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.3 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1080x2460 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 21:9 |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.3 % | 83.1 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 99.3 % | n/a |
| Response time | 46.4 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1163:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.1 mm (6.34 in) | 168.6 mm (6.64 in) |
| Width | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) | 76.6 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) | 9.3 mm (0.37 in) |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Silver - Gold - Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2 (Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 11 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 510 | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1551 | 1976 |
| CPU | 90638 | 133817 |
| GPU | 42930 | 72467 |
| Memory | 45249 | 110951 |
| UX | 56683 | 121869 |
| NanoReview Score | 235500 | 439104 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 37 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 98 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 1 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 219 | n/a |
| Writing score | 6414 | n/a |
| Web score | 5709 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4846 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5102 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6387 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 8 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12.5 | HIOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 35 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:05 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 08:01 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:48 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:03 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 95 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGM1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV8856 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4224x3136 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Focal length | 2821 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13855 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 / 1900 / 2000 / 2300 / 2500 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B850/B900/B1800/B1900/B2000/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | |
| LTE category | 12 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | November, 2019 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2019 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 216 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 180 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Pova 7 Neo the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0