Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T Manufactured in December, 2019, with display 6.3 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 665, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G, Manufactured in December, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
- Higher pixel density: 409ppi
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G
- Larger display: 6.77in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 183.7g vs 200g
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/32 GB - 4/32 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.3 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.3 % | 89.7 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 99.3 % | n/a |
| Response time | 46.4 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1163:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.1 mm (6.34 in) | 164 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 183.7 g (6.48 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Blue - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2 (Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 11 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 510 | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1551 | 2025 |
| CPU | 90638 | 132724 |
| GPU | 42930 | 72238 |
| Memory | 45249 | 109980 |
| UX | 56683 | 122242 |
| NanoReview Score | 235500 | 437184 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 37 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 98 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 1 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 219 | n/a |
| Writing score | 6414 | n/a |
| Web score | 5709 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4846 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5102 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6387 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 8 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 12.5 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 35 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:05 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 08:01 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:48 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:03 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 95 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGM1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.67 (0.6) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV8856 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4224x3136 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 2821 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13855 | Omnivision OV02F |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9 | 1/5 (0.2) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.75 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 / 1900 / 2000 / 2300 / 2500 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B850/B900/B1800/B1900/B2000/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | n/a |
| LTE category | 12 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2019 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2019 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 216 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0