Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z11x
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Manufactured in May, 2020, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G, vs Vivo iQOO Z11x, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Lighter design: 209g vs 219g
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z11x
- Larger display: 6.76in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7200mAh vs 5020mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.76 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1080x2344 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 382 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.4 % | 85.9 % |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 2404 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 35.2 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1649:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.8 mm (6.53 in) | 166.6 mm (6.56 in) |
| Width | 76.7 mm (3.02 in) | 78.4 mm (3.09 in) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Gray - Green |
- Black - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.3 (Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 692 | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 618 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 719 | 1064 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1874 | 2878 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 3062 |
| CPU | 139577 | 329972 |
| GPU | 73153 | 147724 |
| Memory | 72832 | 155228 |
| UX | 104277 | 289303 |
| NanoReview Score | 389839 | 922227 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 42.3 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 6 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1044 | n/a |
| Writing score | 9643 | n/a |
| Web score | 6022 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5453 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 6923 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8136 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 18.9 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | MIUI 14 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 5020 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 44 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 43 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:20 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 10:27 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 13:57 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:33 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 143 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9248x6920 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 5 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | n/a |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung Bright S5KGW1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.72 | 1/2.93 (0.34) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC8034 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.48 | n/a |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV32A1Q | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 / 2300 / 2500 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | n/a |
| LTE category | 12 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | April, 2020 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2020 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 185 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 0 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z11x the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0