Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Manufactured in April, 2020, with display 6.67 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, Manufactured in February, 2018 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 636. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5 vs 4.2
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
- Higher pixel density: 403ppi
- Lighter design: 180g vs 210g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 6/64 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 5.99 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1080x2160 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 18:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 628 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84 % | 77.4 % |
| sRGB gamut | 114.9 % | 99.7 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 2358 Hz |
| Response time | 34 ms | 38 ms |
| Contrast | 1111:1 | 2252:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 166 mm (6.54 in) | 158.5 mm (6.24 in) |
| Width | 77 mm (3.03 in) | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Glass | Metal |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- Black - Gold - Blue - Red - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.3 (Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)) |
- 4/1.6 (Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/1.8 (Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 692 | Hexagon 680 |
| Graphics | Adreno 618 | Adreno 509 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 720 MHz |
| FLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | 184.3 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 722 | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1880 | n/a |
| CPU | 130988 | 85476 |
| GPU | 90091 | 25195 |
| Memory | 72615 | 47099 |
| UX | 93523 | 54722 |
| NanoReview Score | 387217 | 212492 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 42.4 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 98 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 6 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1041 | n/a |
| Writing score | 9663 | 6028 |
| Web score | 5943 | 5001 |
| Video editing | 5437 | 5098 |
| Data manipulation | 6802 | 4881 |
| NanoReview Score | 8091 | 6083 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
- 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | - 32 GB - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) | Android 7.1 (Upgradeable to Android 9.0) |
| OS Size | 18 GB | 8 GB |
| UI Skin | MIUI 14 | MIUI 12 |
Battery
| Volume | 5020 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 50 min) | Yes Quick Charge 3.0 (50% in 50 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:30 h | 2:10 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:56 h | 08:00 h |
| Video Playback | 15:15 h | 11:41 h |
| Games | 05:45 h | 04:47 h |
| Standby Mode | 136 h | 84 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 12 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | 4000x3000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 5 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 12 MP Depth: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGM2 | Samsung S5K2L7 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/2.55 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1.4 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV8856 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV16A1Q | Omnivision OV13855 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | 1/2.9 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.4 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 4.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Active |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 / 2300 / 2500 | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900, HSDPA 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | LTE (B850/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500) |
| LTE category | 12 | 12 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2020 yr | February, 2018 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2020 yr | February, 2018 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 200 | 190 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0