Home Phone comparison Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 and Tecno Camon 19 - Which is better?

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Tecno Camon 19

82 out 100
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
VS
45 out 100
Tecno Camon 19
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
Tecno Camon 19

Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Manufactured in January, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra, vs Tecno Camon 19, Manufactured in July, 2022 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
  • Higher pixel density: 446ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 6550mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5
  • Infrared port
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 19
  • Larger display: 6.8in
  • Lighter design: 198g vs 203.5g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB		 - 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB

Review

Key Specs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 and Tecno Camon 19
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
vs
Tecno Camon 19

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED IPS LCD
Size 6.67 in 6.8 in
Resolution 1220x2712 pixels 1080x2460 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20.5:9
Pixel density 446 ppi 395 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) No
Max brightness 1400 nits 500 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision No
Touch Sampling Rate 480 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 88.7 % 88.6 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 160.95 mm (6.34 in) 166.63 mm (6.56 in)
Width 75.24 mm (2.96 in) 74.37 mm (2.93 in)
Thickness 8.06 mm (0.32 in) 8.3 mm (0.33 in)
Weight 203.5 g (7.18 oz) 198 g (6.98 oz)
Water resistance IP68 No
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel n/a Plastic
Frame n/a Plastic
Colors - White
- Black
- Blue		 - White
- Black
- Green
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
88.7 %
Tecno Camon 19
88.6 %

Performance

Testing Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 and Tecno Camon 19 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra MediaTek Helio G85
Max Frequency 3250 MHz 2000 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725)
- 3/3 (Cortex-A725)
- 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725)		 - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2 (Cortex-A75)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 12 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 880 Yes
Graphics Mali-G720 MP7 Mali-G52 MP2
GPU Cores 896 48
GPU Frequency 1300 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS 2329.6 GFLOPS 96 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
1657
Tecno Camon 19
422
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
6515
Tecno Camon 19
1403
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)1657422
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)65151403
Geekbench Compute (GPU)12787n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4], [Tecno Camon 19]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
1769868
Tecno Camon 19
237590
CPU40185379884
GPU66428233230
Memory37872559280
UX32500865196
NanoReview Score1769868237590
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
n/a
Tecno Camon 19
730
Stabilityn/a98 %
Graphics Testn/a4 fps
Graphics Scoren/a730
Sources: 3DMark [Tecno Camon 19]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
n/a
Tecno Camon 19
8368
Writing scoren/a9131
Web scoren/a8121
Video editingn/a6356
Data manipulationn/a5340
NanoReview Scoren/a8368

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB		 - 4 GB
- 6 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency n/a 1800 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB		128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0eMMC 5.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13)
UI Skin HyperOS 2.0 HIOS 13

Battery

Volume 6550 mAh 5000 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 18 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-ion
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging n/a No
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 19 min) Yes (50% in 60 min)
Full Charge Time 0:46 h 2:33 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 64 MP
Photo resolution n/a 9000x7000 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED Quad LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP		 Standard: 64 MP
Depth: 2 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP64 MP
Aperturef/1.5f/1.7
Focal length26 mm26 mm
SensorSony LYT-600n/a
Sensor size1/1.951/1.7
Pixel size0.8 μm0.8 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalDigital
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix8 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.2n/a
Focal length15 mmn/a
SensorSmartsens SC820CSn/a
Sensor size1/4.0n/a
Pixel size1.12 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitaln/a

Front camera

Matrix 20 MP 16 MP
Photo resolution n/a 4920x3264 pixels
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 25 mm n/a
Sensor Omnivision OV20B CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0 n/a
Pixel size 0.7 μm n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No n/a
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* Yes Varies by region
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM B3/B5/B8n/a
3G BandsWCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19n/a
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66)n/a
LTE categoryn/a7
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos n/a No

Other

Class Mid-range Budget
Announced January, 2025 yr June, 2022 yr
Release Date January, 2025 yr July, 2022 yr
Launch Price ($) 400 185
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 90 W Yes 18 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below