Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Manufactured in January, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra, vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro, Manufactured in March, 2024with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
- Higher pixel density: 446ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6550mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.3
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 30 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 195g vs 203.5g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 pixels | 1080x2436 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1400 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | n/a |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 480 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.95 mm (6.34 in) | 164 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 75.24 mm (2.96 in) | 74.5 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 8.06 mm (0.32 in) | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 203.5 g (7.18 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | n/a |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | n/a | Glass |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 3100 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725) - 3/3 (Cortex-A725) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725) |
- 4/2 (Cortex A55) - 3/3 (Cortex A78) - 1/3.1 (Cortex A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 880 | MediaTek APU 580 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 MP7 | Mali-G610 MP6 |
| GPU Cores | 896 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2329.6 GFLOPS | 1442 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1657 | 1260 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 6515 | 4030 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 12787 | n/a |
| CPU | 401853 | 241338 |
| GPU | 664282 | 239159 |
| Memory | 378725 | 208397 |
| UX | 325008 | 240189 |
| NanoReview Score | 1769868 | 929083 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | n/a |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | HyperOS 2.0 | HIOS 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 6550 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 70 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 19 min) | Yes (50% in 18 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:46 h | 0:44 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Smartsens SC820CS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV20B | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B3/B5/B8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2025 yr | February, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2025 yr | March, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 400 | 400 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | Yes 70 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0