ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G vs Infinix GT 50 Pro
64
out 100
VS
75
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 6.8 with chipsetUnisoc T9100, vs Infinix GT 50 Pro, Manufactured in April, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
- Larger display: 6.8in
Reasons to choose Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 440ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 198g vs 209g
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 6000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | 12/256 GB | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.8 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 pixels | 1208x2644 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 386 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-144 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 0 % | 90.1 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 167.5 mm (6.59 in) | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 76.3 mm (3 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Yellow |
- Black - Silver - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T9100 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 2700 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.1 (Cortex-A55) - 3/2.3 (Cortex-A76) - 1/2.7 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725) - 3/3 (Cortex-A725) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP4 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 128 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 780 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 199.7 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 890 | 1621 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2441 | 6535 |
| CPU | 187773 | 648630 |
| GPU | 93539 | 648885 |
| Memory | 131216 | 389995 |
| UX | 124668 | 450333 |
| NanoReview Score | 537196 | 2137843 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | n/a | XOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | n/a | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | Yes |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 111 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | n/a | GalaxyCore GC08A8 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | n/a | GalaxyCore GC13A0 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 (0.32) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | n/a | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2025 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 230 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 405 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix GT 50 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
