Home Phone comparison ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro - Which is better?

ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro

64 out 100
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
VS
83 out 100
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro

Compared 2 smartphones : ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 6.8 with chipsetUnisoc T9100, vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, Manufactured in July, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
    Reasons to choose Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
    • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
    • Lighter design: 208g vs 209g
    • Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 6000mAh
    • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
    • Infrared port

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options 12/256 GB - 12/256 GB
    - 12/512 GB
    - 16/256 GB
    - 16/512 GB

    Review

    Key Specs ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison
    Smartphones:
    Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
    vs
    Oppo K13 Turbo Pro

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type AMOLED AMOLED
    Size 6.8 in 6.8 in
    Resolution 1080x2392 pixels 1280x2800 pixels
    Aspect ratio n/a 19.5:9
    Pixel density 386 ppi 453 ppi
    Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
    Max brightness 1300 nits 1600 nits
    HDR support No No
    Touch Sampling Rate n/a 240 Hz
    Screen-to-body ratio 0 % 90.3 %
    Features DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 167.5 mm (6.59 in) 162.8 mm (6.41 in)
    Width 76.3 mm (3 in) 77.2 mm (3.04 in)
    Thickness 8.4 mm (0.33 in) 8.3 mm (0.33 in)
    Weight 209 g (7.37 oz) 208 g (7.34 oz)
    Water resistance No IPX9
    Cooling system Vapor chamber Active fan
    Back panel Plastic n/a
    Frame Plastic Plastic
    Colors - Gray
    - Yellow    		 - Black
    - Silver
    - Purple
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes, In-Display
    Screen-to-body ratio
    ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
    0 %
    Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
    90.3 %

    Performance

    Testing ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset Unisoc T9100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
    Max Frequency 2700 MHz 3210 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
    Architecture - 4/2.1 (Cortex-A55)
    - 3/2.3 (Cortex-A76)
    - 1/2.7 (Cortex-A76)    		 - 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720)
    - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720)
    - 3/3 (Cortex-A720)
    - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4)
    Process TSMC TSMC
    Transistor Size 6 nm 4 nm
    Neural Processor Yes Hexagon
    Graphics Mali-G57 MP4 Adreno 825
    GPU Cores 128 1024
    GPU Frequency 780 MHz 1150 MHz
    FLOPS 199.7 GFLOPS 2355.2 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
    890
    Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
    2135
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
    2441
    Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
    6613
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)8902135
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)24416613
    Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a18374
    Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo K13 Turbo Pro]
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
    537196
    Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
    2050329
    CPU187773488465
    GPU93539879994
    Memory131216358672
    UX124668323198
    NanoReview Score5371962050329

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size 12 GB 12 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
    Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 4800 MHz
    Channels 2 4
    Storage
    Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 4.0
    Memory CardNoNo

    Software

    OS Android 15 Android 15
    UI Skin n/a ColorOS 15

    Battery

    Volume 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
    Max Charging Power 80 W 80 W
    Battery Type n/a Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging No Yes
    Fast Charging Yes Yes (63% in 30 min)
    Full Charge Time n/a 0:56 h

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution n/a 8192x6144 pixels
    Zoom Digital Digital
    Flash LED LED
    Stabilization Digital Optical
    8K Recording No No
    4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    Slow Motion n/a 120 fps (1080p)
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Depth: 2 MP    		 Standard: 50 MP
    Depth: 2 MP
    Features - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode    		 - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP50 MP
    Aperturef/1.8f/1.8
    Focal lengthn/a27 mm
    AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationDigitalOptical

    Front camera

    Matrix 16 MP 16 MP
    Photo resolution n/a 4920x3264 pixels
    Aperture f/2.0 f/2.4
    Focal length n/a 22 mm
    Sensor n/a CMOS
    Autofocus No No
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display    		 - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
    Bluetooth features LE LE
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG    		 - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort No No
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo    		 - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    NFC* Varies by region Yes
    Infrared Port No Yes
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    2G Bandsn/aGSM 900/1800MHz
    3G Bandsn/aWCDMA 1/4/5/6/8/19
    LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66)
    5G SupportYesYes

    Sound

    3.5 mm Jack Yes No
    FM Radio n/a No
    Dolby Atmos No n/a

    Other

    Class Mid-range Mid-range
    Announced March, 2025 yr July, 2025 yr
    Release Date May, 2025 yr July, 2025 yr
    Launch Price ($) 230 n/a
    MSRP ($) n/a 359
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor    		 - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 80 W Yes, 80 W
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo K13 Turbo Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    0 (0%)
    1 (100%)
    Total Votes: 1

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below