ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G vs Tecno Spark Go 2
62
out 100
VS
46
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 6.8 with chipsetUnisoc T8300, vs Tecno Spark Go 2, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 386ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 2
- Lighter design: 186g vs 209g
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 4/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.8 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 386 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1000 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 0 % | 84.2 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 167.5 mm (6.59 in) | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) |
| Width | 76.3 mm (3 in) | 77 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Gold |
- White - Black - Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T8300 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 64 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | n/a | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 752 | 438 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2209 | 1437 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 2088 | n/a |
| CPU | 162638 | 95156 |
| GPU | 78410 | 26471 |
| Memory | 119042 | 109093 |
| UX | 119509 | 70926 |
| NanoReview Score | 479599 | 301646 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | n/a | HIOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | n/a | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (49% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:55 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | n/a | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2025 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 139 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 80 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider ZTE Nubia Neo 3 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
