ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro Plus vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
87
out 100
VS
54
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro Plus Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.85 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus, Manufactured in March, 2019 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 9 Octa 9820. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro Plus
- Larger display: 6.85in
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7050mAh vs 4100mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
- Higher pixel density: 522ppi
- Lighter design: 175g vs 229g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 16/512 GB - 24/1024 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.85 in | 6.4 in |
| Resolution | 1216x2688 pixels | 1440x3040 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19:9 |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi | 522 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 2000 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 960 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1 % | 87.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 96.5 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 235 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 4.8 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.42 mm (6.43 in) | 157.6 mm (6.2 in) |
| Width | 76.14 mm (3 in) | 74.1 mm (2.92 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 229 g (8.08 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Active fan | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Silver |
- Black - Blue - Green - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9820 |
| Max Frequency | 4320 MHz | 2730 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.31 (Cortex-A75) - 2/2.73 (Mongoose M4) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 8 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 432 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 720 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS | 607 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3153 | 947 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 9927 | 2460 |
| CPU | 602674 | 165023 |
| GPU | 1244048 | 197322 |
| Memory | 611609 | 120939 |
| UX | 473467 | 154911 |
| NanoReview Score | 2931798 | 638195 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 42.5 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 82 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 19 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3230 |
| Writing score | 36500 | 10100 |
| Web score | 32288 | 6612 |
| Video editing | 9086 | 5772 |
| Data manipulation | 16609 | 6847 |
| NanoReview Score | 25645 | 8595 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 16 GB - 24 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | n/a | 46.5 GB |
| UI Skin | Redmagic OS 10 | One UI 4.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 7050 mAh | 4100 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes Qi/PMA (15 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 11 min) | Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:30 h | 1:40 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 05:58 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 11:15 h |
| Games | n/a | 04:15 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 80 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6120 pixels | 4000x3000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 122 ° | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 12 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 16 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 - 2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50E | Samsung SAK2L4 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.5 | 1/2.55 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.4 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 12 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 52 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3M3 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.6 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 12 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV50D40 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.88 | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 0.61 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 10 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4608x3456 pixels | 4320x2432 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | 1/2.65 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GMS 2/3/5/8 | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8 (900) |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B28B/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | February, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | March, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 869 | 1000 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 120 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro Plus the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
