Apple A11 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
40
out 100
VS
29
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple A11 Bionic, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 169816 | 97035 |
| GPU | 123983 | 116400 |
| Memory | 100789 | 87397 |
| UX | 91913 | 67775 |
| NanoReview Score | 486501 | 368607 |
| Stability | 71 % | 95 % |
| Graphics Test | 20 fps | 6 fps |
| File Compression | 104 MB/s | 89.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 53.7 pages/s | 51.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 50.2 MP/sec | 58.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 9.18 frames/s | 2.83 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 30.7 frames/s | 12 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 15.5 frames/s | 14.1 frames/s |
| HDR | 83.7 MP/sec | 55.2 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 3.19 MP/sec | 2.43 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2/2.39 (Monsoon) - 4/1.42 (Mistral) |
- 4/2.45 (Kryo 280 Cortex-A73) - 4/1.9 (Kryo 280 Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 6 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2390 | 2450 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB |
| Process tech. | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Transistor count | 4.3 billion | 3 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 8 W | 9 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Apple A11 GPU | Adreno 540 |
| Architecture | Apple Bionic GPU | Adreno 500 |
| GPU Frequency | 1066 MHz | 710 MHz |
| Execution Units | 3 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 64 | 64 |
| Total shader | 192 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 409.3 GFLOPS | 363.5 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.0 |
| OpenCL | n/a | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 11 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Apple Neural Engine | Hexagon 682 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 34.1 Gbit/s | 29.8 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | NVMe | UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2436x1125 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x32 pixels | 1x32 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - Motion JPEG |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X16 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 16 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 MB/s | Up to 1000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
Other
| Announced | September, 2017 yr | November, 2016 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | APL1W72 | MSM8998 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple A11 Bionic the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
