Apple A15 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
81
out 100
VS
43
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple A15 Bionic, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 309916 | 212957 |
| GPU | 432105 | 154666 |
| Memory | 243964 | 137272 |
| UX | 313105 | 130785 |
| NanoReview Score | 1299090 | 635680 |
| Stability | 82 % | 98 % |
| Graphics Test | 56 fps | 15 fps |
| File Compression | 203.3 MB/s | 159.1 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 124.4 pages/s | 74.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 143.5 MP/sec | 118.7 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 22.2 frames/s | 11.2 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 60.2 frames/s | 26.5 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 130 frames/s | 58.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 169.9 MP/sec | 95.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 5.93 MP/sec | 4.28 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche - 4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard |
- 1/2.5 (Kryo 670 Prime Cortex-A78) - 3/2.4 (Kryo 670 Gold Cortex-A78) - 4/1.8 (Kryo 670 Silver Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 6 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3230 | 2500 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.5-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor count | 15 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Apple A15 GPU | Adreno 642 |
| Architecture | Apple Bionic GPU | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 1338 MHz | 608 MHz |
| Execution Units | 5 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 256 |
| Total shader | 640 | 512 |
| FLOPS | 1712.6 GFLOPS | 622.6 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | n/a | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Apple Neural Engine | Hexagon 770 |
| GPU Frequency | 15.8 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 34.1 Gbit/s | 25.6 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 6 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | NVMe | - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.0 - UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2732x2048 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x192 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 - Motion JPEG |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AAX - AAX+ - AC-3 - AIFF - CAF - E-AC-3 - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X53 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7500 MB/s | Up to 3700 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 3000 MB/s | Up to 1600 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | September, 2021 yr | October, 2021 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Codename | APL1W07 | SM7325-AE |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple A15 Bionic the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
