Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1480
81
out 100
VS
45
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple A15 Bionic, vs Samsung Exynos 1480. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 309916 | 227818 |
| GPU | 432105 | 166248 |
| Memory | 243964 | 150386 |
| UX | 313105 | 178841 |
| NanoReview Score | 1299090 | 723293 |
| Stability | 82 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 56 fps | 23 fps |
| File Compression | 203.3 MB/s | 176.8 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 124.4 pages/s | 89.8 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 143.5 MP/sec | 149.2 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 22.2 frames/s | 13.5 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 60.2 frames/s | 32.7 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 130 frames/s | 67.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 169.9 MP/sec | 113.8 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 5.93 MP/sec | 4.92 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche - 4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard |
- 4x 2.75 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 6 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3230 | 2750 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.5-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | 15 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Apple A15 GPU | Samsung Xclipse 530 |
| Architecture | Apple Bionic GPU | Titan (RDNA 2) |
| GPU Frequency | 1338 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Execution Units | 5 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shader | 640 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 1712.6 GFLOPS | 332.8 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | n/a | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Apple Neural Engine | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | 15.8 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 34.1 Gbit/s | 25.6 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | NVMe | - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2732x2048 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 - Motion JPEG |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AAX - AAX+ - AC-3 - AIFF - CAF - E-AC-3 - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7500 MB/s | Up to 5100 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 3000 MB/s | Up to 1280 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | September, 2021 yr | March, 2024 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Codename | APL1W07 | S5E8845 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple A15 Bionic the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
