Apple A18 vs MediaTek Helio G85
95
out 100
VS
25
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple A18, vs MediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 431354 | 75141 |
| GPU | 598981 | 41989 |
| Memory | 208837 | 67477 |
| UX | 365876 | 78642 |
| NanoReview Score | 1605038 | 263249 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 4 fps |
| File Compression | 286.8 MB/s | 75.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 184.2 pages/s | 38.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 201.2 MP/sec | 44.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 36.2 frames/s | 3.05 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 90 frames/s | 12.2 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 297.2 frames/s | 23.5 frames/s |
| HDR | 279.1 MP/sec | 43.3 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 8.68 MP/sec | 1.75 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 45 FPS (High) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 40 FPS (Medium) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 21 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 49 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 51 FPS (Medium) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 46 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (1080x2340) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 4.05 GHz – Everest - 4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth |
- 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 6 | 8 |
| Frequency | 4050 | 2000 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 12 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 9 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Apple A18 GPU | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Architecture | Apple Bionic GPU | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1490 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution Units | 5 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 24 |
| Total shader | 640 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 1907 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | n/a | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Neural Engine | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | 35 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3750 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 60 Gbit/s | 13.41 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | NVMe | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | n/a | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x48 pixels | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 120FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 120FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP8 - VP9 - Motion JPEG |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AAX - AAX+ - AC-3 - AIFF - CAF - E-AC-3 - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X75 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 10000 MB/s | Up to 300 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 3500 MB/s | Up to 100 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | April, 2020 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Low end |
| Codename | APL1V08 | MT6769Z |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple A18 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
