Apple A18 vs MediaTek Helio P35

95 out 100
Apple A18
VS
22 out 100
MediaTek Helio P35

Compared 2 processors: Apple A18, vs MediaTek Helio P35. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Apple A18 and MediaTek Helio P35
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Processors:
vs

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Apple A18
1605038
MediaTek Helio P35
147723
CPU43135455950
GPU59898116124
Memory20883736757
UX36587638892
NanoReview Score1605038147723
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Apple A18
3466
MediaTek Helio P35
260
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Apple A18
8592
MediaTek Helio P35
812
File Compression286.8 MB/sn/a
HTML5 Browser184.2 pages/sn/a
PDF Rendering201.2 MP/secn/a
Background Blur36.2 frames/sn/a
Photo Processing90 frames/sn/a
Image Detection297.2 frames/sn/a
HDR279.1 MP/secn/a
Ray Tracing8.68 MP/secn/a

Processor

Architecture - 2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
- 4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
- 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53)
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53)
Process TSMC TSMC
Cores count 6 8
Frequency 4050 2300
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache 8 MB n/a
Process tech. 3 nm 12 nm
Power (TDP) 9 W 2.2 W

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Apple A18 GPU PowerVR GE8320
Architecture Apple Bionic GPU PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue)
GPU Frequency 1490 MHz 680 MHz
Execution Units 5 4
Shader Units 128 8
Total shader 640 32
FLOPS 1907 GFLOPS 43.5 GFLOPS
Vulkan n/a 1.1
OpenCL n/a 1.2

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Neural Engine No
GPU Frequency 35 TOPS n/a

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 3750 MHz 1600 MHz
Bus 4x16 bit 2x16 bit
Bandwidth 60 Gbit/s 14.9 Gbit/s
Max RAM 8 GB 6 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type NVMe eMMC 5.1
Max. resolution n/a 2400x1080 pixels
Camera 1x48 pixels 1x25 pixels
Video recording 4K at 120FPS 1K at 30FPS
Video quality 4K at 120FPS 1080p at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
- H.264
- H.265
Audio codecs - AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X75 n/a
4G Support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 7
5G Support Yes No
Download speed Up to 10000 MB/s Up to 300 MB/s
Upload speed Up to 3500 MB/s Up to 150 MB/s
Wi-Fi version 7 5
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.0
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS

Other

Announced September, 2024 yr December, 2018 yr
Class Flagship Low end
Codename APL1V08 MT6765

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Apple A18 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below