Apple M1 (iPad) vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020
95
out 100
VS
62
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple M1 (iPad), vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 479517 | 351356 |
| GPU | 777678 | 288768 |
| Memory | 194372 | 443211 |
| UX | 334430 | 211533 |
| NanoReview Score | 1795997 | 1294877 |
| Stability | 73 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 102 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 326.3 MB/s | 203.6 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 176 pages/s | 144.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 224.2 MP/sec | 162.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 31.9 frames/s | 16.1 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 70 frames/s | 51.8 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 192 frames/s | 91.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 283 MP/sec | 138.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 9.65 MP/sec | 6.36 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.1 GHz – Firestorm - 4x 3.2 GHz – Icestorm |
- 1x 2.5 GHz – TaiShan V121 - 3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan V120 - 4x 1.6 GHz – Taishan-Little |
| Process | TSMC | SMIC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3200 | 2500 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.5-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 10 MB |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistor count | 16 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 14 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Apple M1 GPU | Maleoon 920 |
| Architecture | Apple GPU | Maleoon |
| GPU Frequency | 1278 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Execution Units | 8 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 256 |
| Total shader | 1024 | 1024 |
| FLOPS | 2617 GFLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | n/a | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Apple Neural Engine | Da Vinci |
| GPU Frequency | 11 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.25 Gbit/s | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | NVMe | UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2732x2048 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 - Motion JPEG |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Balong 6000 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7500 MB/s | n/a |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | November, 2020 yr | November, 2024 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | APL1102 | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple M1 (iPad) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
