Apple M4 (iPad) vs Samsung Exynos 2200
99
out 100
VS
63
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Apple M4 (iPad), vs Samsung Exynos 2200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 763066 | 316037 |
| GPU | 1167582 | 424486 |
| Memory | 430483 | 170650 |
| UX | 436146 | 226015 |
| NanoReview Score | 2797277 | 1137188 |
| Stability | n/a | 61 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 49 fps |
| File Compression | 577.3 MB/s | 151.9 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 341.4 pages/s | 93.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 367.5 MP/sec | 106.3 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 57.2 frames/s | 13.3 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 149.6 frames/s | 27 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 422.4 frames/s | 92.5 frames/s |
| HDR | 506.2 MP/sec | 123.8 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 17.7 MP/sec | 4.48 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 4.4 GHz – - 5x 2.85 GHz – |
- 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 - 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 - 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 9 | 8 |
| Frequency | 4400 | 2800 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | 28 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 14 W | 7 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Apple M4 GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| Architecture | Apple GPU | Voyager (RDNA 2) |
| GPU Frequency | 1598 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Execution Units | 10 | 3 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shader | 1280 | 384 |
| FLOPS | 4090 GFLOPS | 1003 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | n/a | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Apple Neural Engine | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | 38 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 7500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 120 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | NVMe | UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2064x2752 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X70 | Exynos 5300 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 10000 MB/s | Up to 7350 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 3500 MB/s | Up to 3670 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | January, 2022 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | n/a | S5E9925 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple M4 (iPad) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
