Google Tensor G4 vs Google Tensor G2
72
out 100
VS
56
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Google Tensor G4, vs Google Tensor G2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 346368 | 256594 |
| GPU | 457862 | 315697 |
| Memory | 219407 | 168964 |
| UX | 233692 | 194845 |
| NanoReview Score | 1257329 | 936100 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 36 fps |
| File Compression | 191.8 MB/s | 166.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 148.7 pages/s | 107.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 158.3 MP/sec | 117.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 15.6 frames/s | 14.4 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 46 frames/s | 37.4 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 123.4 frames/s | 87.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 134.5 MP/sec | 122.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.8 MP/sec | 4.52 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4 - 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 4x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
- 2/2.85 (Cortex-X1) - 2/2.35 (Cortex-A78) - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3100 | 2850 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 7 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G715 MP7 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| Architecture | Valhall 4th gen | Valhall 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 940 MHz | 848 MHz |
| Execution Units | 7 | 7 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 64 |
| Total shader | 896 | 448 |
| FLOPS | 1684.4 GFLOPS | 759.8 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0 |
UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2400 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5400c | Exynos 5300g |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 7350 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 3670 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | October, 2022 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | GS401 (S5P9875) | GS201 (S5P9855) |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Google Tensor G4 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
