Google Tensor G5 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
n/a
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Google Tensor G5, vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 321891 | 242171 |
| GPU | 490471 | 315801 |
| Memory | 321568 | 155272 |
| UX | 312012 | 188275 |
| NanoReview Score | 1445942 | 901517 |
| Stability | n/a | 54 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 36 fps |
| File Compression | n/a | 146.1 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 90.8 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 113.9 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 11.8 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 29.7 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 71.8 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 98.9 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 4.01 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 81 FPS (Ultra) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 44 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 29 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 51 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 58 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | Huawei Mate 40 Pro (1344x3140) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4 - 5x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
- 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 - 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 - 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3400 | 3130 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 15.3 billion |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | n/a | Mali-G78 MP24 |
| Architecture | n/a | Valhall 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 759 MHz |
| Execution Units | n/a | 24 |
| Shader Units | n/a | 32 |
| Total shader | n/a | 768 |
| FLOPS | 1536 GFLOPS | 1165.8 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | n/a | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | AI accelerator |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2750 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 44 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0 |
UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2400 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | n/a |
| Video recording | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Balong 5000 |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 4600 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 2500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | August, 2025 yr | October, 2020 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 9000 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
