Google Tensor G5 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
n/a
out 100
VS
29
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Google Tensor G5, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 321891 | 104065 |
| GPU | 490471 | 39362 |
| Memory | 321568 | 92127 |
| UX | 312012 | 72779 |
| NanoReview Score | 1445942 | 308333 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 3 fps |
| File Compression | n/a | 90 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 46.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 64.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 3.06 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 11.7 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 16.3 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 51.6 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 2.52 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 59 FPS (Medium) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 60 FPS (Low) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 23 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 65 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 62 FPS (Medium) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 54 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 26 FPS (Low) |
| Device | n/a | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4 - 5x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
- 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold Cortex-A73) - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3400 | 2400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 3 nm | 6 nm |
Graphics
| GPU Model | n/a | Adreno 610 |
| Architecture | n/a | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Execution Units | n/a | 1 |
| Shader Units | n/a | 128 |
| Total shader | n/a | 128 |
| FLOPS | 1536 GFLOPS | 285.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | n/a | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | n/a | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Hexagon 686 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0 |
- eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2400 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x64 pixels |
| Video recording | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X11 |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 390 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | August, 2025 yr | October, 2021 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Low end |
| Codename | n/a | SM6225 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
