Google Tensor vs Google Tensor G5
53
out 100
VS
n/a
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Google Tensor, vs Google Tensor G5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 244272 | 321891 |
| GPU | 272857 | 490471 |
| Memory | 186513 | 321568 |
| UX | 198008 | 312012 |
| NanoReview Score | 901650 | 1445942 |
| Stability | 56 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 37 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 134.4 MB/s | n/a |
| HTML5 Browser | 86.7 pages/s | n/a |
| PDF Rendering | 103.4 MP/sec | n/a |
| Background Blur | 10.1 frames/s | n/a |
| Photo Processing | 32.8 frames/s | n/a |
| Image Detection | 70.5 frames/s | n/a |
| HDR | 92.1 MP/sec | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | 3.79 MP/sec | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1 - 2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76 - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55 |
- 1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4 - 5x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2800 | 3400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5.6 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G78 MP20 | n/a |
| Architecture | Valhall 2nd gen | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Execution Units | 20 | n/a |
| Shader Units | 32 | n/a |
| Total shader | 640 | n/a |
| FLOPS | 1085.4 GFLOPS | 1536 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Tensor Processing Unit | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | n/a |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | n/a |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | - UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 3840x2400 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5300b | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7350 MB/s | n/a |
| Upload speed | Up to 3670 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
Other
| Announced | October, 2021 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | GS101 (S5P9845) | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Google Tensor the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
