Google Tensor vs Unisoc Tiger T612
53
out 100
VS
25
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Google Tensor, vs Unisoc Tiger T612. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 244272 | 91018 |
| GPU | 272857 | 22600 |
| Memory | 186513 | 65184 |
| UX | 198008 | 65914 |
| NanoReview Score | 901650 | 244716 |
| Stability | 56 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 37 fps | 2 fps |
| File Compression | 134.4 MB/s | 76.7 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 86.7 pages/s | 43.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 103.4 MP/sec | 53.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 10.1 frames/s | 4.12 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 32.8 frames/s | 14.5 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 70.5 frames/s | 25 frames/s |
| HDR | 92.1 MP/sec | 44.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 3.79 MP/sec | 2.22 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1 - 2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76 - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55 |
- 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2800 | 1800 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5.6 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G78 MP20 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2nd gen | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution Units | 20 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 32 |
| Total shader | 640 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 1085.4 GFLOPS | 39.3 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Tensor Processing Unit | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | n/a |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 - UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 2400x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x108 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5300b | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 7350 MB/s | Up to 300 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 3670 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | October, 2021 yr | May, 2022 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Low end |
| Codename | GS101 (S5P9845) | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Google Tensor the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
