HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
17
out 100
VS
29
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 659, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 46276 | 104065 |
| GPU | 7090 | 39362 |
| Memory | 17518 | 92127 |
| UX | 32873 | 72779 |
| NanoReview Score | 103757 | 308333 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 3 fps |
| File Compression | 62.5 MB/s | 90 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 27.2 pages/s | 46.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 39 MP/sec | 64.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 0.84 frames/s | 3.06 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 6.86 frames/s | 11.7 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 10 frames/s | 16.3 frames/s |
| HDR | 26.1 MP/sec | 51.6 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 1.71 MP/sec | 2.52 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 59 FPS (Medium) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 60 FPS (Low) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 23 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 65 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 62 FPS (Medium) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 54 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 26 FPS (Low) |
| Device | n/a | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A53 - 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
- 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold Cortex-A73) - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver Cortex-A53) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2360 | 2400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor count | 4 billion | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-T830 MP2 | Adreno 610 |
| Architecture | Midgard 4th gen | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 16 | 128 |
| Total shader | 32 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 57.6 GFLOPS | 285.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Hexagon 686 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 933 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | eMMC 5.1 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 1920x1200 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x16 pixels | 1x64 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X11 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 390 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 50 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | January, 2017 yr | October, 2021 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Low end |
| Codename | Hi6250 | SM6225 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
