HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
23
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 710A, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 86750 | 274580 |
| GPU | 34226 | 237549 |
| Memory | 53515 | 154592 |
| UX | 63929 | 188163 |
| NanoReview Score | 238420 | 854884 |
| Graphics Test | 3 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 74 MB/s | n/a |
| HTML5 Browser | 31.1 pages/s | n/a |
| PDF Rendering | 48.3 MP/sec | n/a |
| Background Blur | 1.93 frames/s | n/a |
| Photo Processing | 8.4 frames/s | n/a |
| Image Detection | 13.7 frames/s | n/a |
| HDR | 41.7 MP/sec | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | 1.9 MP/sec | n/a |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
48 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
30 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
26 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
54 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
60 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
58 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
| Device | Huawei Honor 9C (1560x720) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A73 - 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
- 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime Cortex-A720) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold Cortex-A720) - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver Cortex-A520) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2700 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 512 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G51 MP4 | Adreno 810 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 1st gen | Adreno 800 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | n/a |
| Execution Units | 4 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 8 | 128 |
| Total shader | 32 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 64 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 25.6 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
- UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2340x1080 pixels | 2900x1300 pixels |
| Camera | 1x40 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Snapdragon X62 5G |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 600 MB/s | Up to 2900 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 1600 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | June, 2020 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | n/a | SM7635-AC |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
